Last night I was talking to Emily about UTI, how not having health insurance has driven me to stave them off with cranberry juice alone, and as a result I could be less immune to antibiotics used to treat them, which
I've heard can be a problem. Now I hear of
a study that shows patients seeking cosmetic procedures from a dermatologist get appointments faster than patients with
real medical concerns, such as potentially cancerous moles. Why? Insurance companies usually don't cover Botox treatments or other cosmetic dermatological procedures, so patients pay out-of-pocket for these in the hundreds. But a mole exam covered by insurance usually nets about $75 bucks a pop, which doctors get months later from the insurer. Botox that is licensed for cosmetic use can be administered by beauticians and spas, but if doctors can get in on the action (by asserting that
Botox in an non-medical setting is unsafe or
dubious), they will, and they'll prioritize those cases. Since me and
47 million other N. Americans are uninsured, we'll be paying out of pocket for our mole exams as well as our Botox. Maybe we should ask for a package deal?
Via Jezebel.
No comments:
Post a Comment